Indeed, events that were requisite for the rest of the tale to develop as it did. Yet that an entirely different person would make every one of the same choices up until now, without fail...
[Compelling evidence for the idea that things were "meant" to be this way, that events have a certain weight to them, but he does not want to suggest it for a multitude of reasons -- chief among them being that acknowledging the possibility that Amaurot's fall was something that was always meant to happen is a bitter taste in his mouth.
He makes a displeased face, then refocuses. A tasteless suggestion to make to the man who could change the future where the Ascians could not, besides.]
Then it is clear that the remainder of your memory and mine align properly, except for that one odd factor. But how similar must these two people be to have arrived at the same point, despite presumably separate origins?
no subject
[Compelling evidence for the idea that things were "meant" to be this way, that events have a certain weight to them, but he does not want to suggest it for a multitude of reasons -- chief among them being that acknowledging the possibility that Amaurot's fall was something that was always meant to happen is a bitter taste in his mouth.
He makes a displeased face, then refocuses. A tasteless suggestion to make to the man who could change the future where the Ascians could not, besides.]
Then it is clear that the remainder of your memory and mine align properly, except for that one odd factor. But how similar must these two people be to have arrived at the same point, despite presumably separate origins?